Evaluate Result of Study

Best Techniques to Evaluate Result of Study or A Research

The most crucial part of research is to evaluate the result of a study or research. The evaluation process must be rigorous to analyze the findings in the light of research questions. Every researcher should be aware of the methodologies to evaluate the study findings. This article will tell you about the best techniques to evaluate the results of a study for your research.

What Are The 4 Types Of Evaluation?

Following are the four types of evaluation:

Descriptive Evaluation

The descriptive analysis evaluation approach is the foundation of any analytic reflection. It seeks to answer the question, “What did happen?” It accomplishes this by organizing, processing, and analyzing raw data from various sources. Descriptive evaluation transforms the results of a study into valuable insights. Data evaluated through descriptive analysis in market research is valuable for building strategies.

Descriptive analysis is necessary because it helps us convey our findings in an understandable manner. However, it is important to note that this analysis will not be able to forecast future events. It also does not provide insights into the causes of a happening.  But this approach will organize your data and make it suitable for further research. Descriptive evaluation is a common technique in quantitative research to evaluate result of study. Researchers use descriptive evaluation to describe and categorize the responses gathered through surveys. Descriptive evaluation pertains to the following categories:

Central Tendency

The centre or average values of data sets are the focus of measures of central tendency. In contrast, the dispersion of data is the focus of measures of variability.  The usage of charts, graphs, and generalized explanations are common in these two measures. It assists the readers to grasp the significance of the study findings.

The central tendency evaluation method describes the central location of data in the dataset. It utilizes mean, median and mode to assess the prevalent patterns in the study findings. Moreover, it also helps the researchers explain the occurrence of every data point in the data distribution. However, most of the students who don’t have any idea about this category prefer to get research proposal help thoroughly to evaluate result of study or research.

Measures of Variability

Measures of variability, often known as spread measures, are beneficial to determine how scattered a collection of data’s distribution is. It is opposite to the central tendency method. Central tendency measurements may provide a researcher with the aggregate of data collection. But it does not inform them about the distribution patterns of data.

Measures of Position

The descriptive analysis also entails determining the relative location of a particular value or response to others. Statistics such as percentile rank and quartiles are quite valuable in quantitative research.

Exploratory Evaluation

The exploratory evaluation’s principal goal is to investigate, as the name implies. There was still no understanding of the link between the dataset and the variables before it. After a researcher reviews the data, he or she may use exploratory evaluation to make connections. It helps the researcher establish patterns in the data and develop ideas and solutions to specific issues. Data mining is a typical example of exploratory evaluation.

Diagnostic Evaluation

Diagnostic evaluation is one of the evaluation methods to evaluate result of study. This method enables the researcher to evaluate why did something happen? It’s a thorough investigation into your data in quest of useful information. The first phase in research evaluation is descriptive analysis, which is a simpler procedure. Descriptive analysis evaluates and records the occurrences.  Diagnostic evaluation is an advanced step that elucidates the reasons behind specific outcomes.

Diagnostic evaluation utilizes data exploration and correlational strategies to evaluate data. Analysts pick data sources that will aid them in interpreting the outcomes throughout the discovery phase. Drilling down entails concentrating on a particular aspect of the data or a specific component. Data mining is a computerized method of extracting information from a large amount of unstructured data. Finding regular patterns in the data set can also assist researchers in determining the scope of the inquiry.

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive evaluation of the data set pertains to the predictive quality of the gathered data. It helps the researchers in addressing the question, “What is the likelihood of something happening in the future?”. This form of analysis is a level up from descriptive and diagnostic evaluations. Predictive analysis employs the information researchers gather to develop rational predictions about what will happen next. This evaluation utilizes statistical modelling. It necessitates the use of additional technology and labour to forecast. It’s also crucial to remember that forecasting is merely a guess. The accuracy of forecasts depends on high-quality and thorough data.

How Do You Evaluate Result of Study or Research?

Before publishing the findings, the researcher should devote some time to a particular phase of research called evaluation. He should evaluate the results by asking the following questions

  • Are the results consistent with the initial objectives of the study?
  • Are there any variations and contradictions in the data?
  • Is the data accurate?
  • Is the data supporting or refuting the proposed hypothesis?
  • Can the researcher improve the overall quality of the findings?
  • Is there any data that should be discarded?

Assess The Reliability Of The Findings

The second step is to evaluate the reliability of the findings. Researchers need to ask the following questions:

  • Are the findings reliable?
  • What is the probability of false findings?
  • What is the margin of error in the research findings?

Evaluate the Theoretical Models

The most important step in evaluating the results of a study is to assess the theoretical models. A research’s findings may turn out to be insufficient if the original theoretical framework is inconsistent and contradictory. You must be thinking that this process comes prior to data collection. But most of the time, a researcher is unaware of such anomalies.

In the initial steps, researchers develop tentative research problems, questions and hypotheses. Which are either validated or refuted in the later research process. After gathering much information about the investigated topic, researchers have a better understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of the topic. So, before evaluating the findings, it is essential to ensure that the data set is consistent with the theoretical models.

What Are The 3 Methods Of Evaluation?

Following are three methods of data evaluation:

Cluster Evaluation

The process of arranging a set of data components in such a way that they are more similar (in a certain sense) to one another. The arranged data is in stark contrast to other groups or clusters. Because clustering has no goal variable, it is frequently used to uncover hidden patterns in data. The technique may also be used to offer perspective to a pattern or statistic.

Cohort Evaluation

Cohort evaluation is a common practice in market research. It employs historical data to analyze a particular data set. Researchers often utilize cohort evaluation to compare data sets by grouping them together based on shared attributes. It is a beneficial evaluation method that enables the researchers to gain deep insights into the data set. Cohort evaluation in market research enables the companies to comprehend the market practices. It enables businesses to understand the impact of their activities in the market.

Regression Evaluation

A collection of statistical procedures for estimating connections between a dependent variable. One or more independent variables is known as regression evaluation. It may be used to determine the correlation between variables and predict how they will interact in the future. Researchers often use this evaluation method when they have to predict and forecast future occurrences.

Which Is The Best Evaluation Method?

Statistical evaluation is the method of evaluating the findings of a research. It reduces the margin of biasness and enhances the reliability of the data. Statistical evaluation encompasses the utilization of statistical tools and methods to interpret the findings. It is a common approach in quantitative research which involves numerical data. It encompasses the survey data and the observational data. There are different tools to perform statistical evaluation. Such as the Statistical analysis System (SAS) and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

Statistical evaluation of data involves analyzing the relationship between the variables. Most of the time, the data comprises univariate or multivariate findings. The variation in statistical methods to evaluate the findings depends upon the number of variables a research study has. Statistical evaluation encompasses continuous data and discreet data. Continuous data pertains to a dataset that is not countable. Discreet data encompasses such data that is countable.

Conclusion

Evaluating the results of a study is essential to ensure that the study’s findings are consistent with the research problem and research questions. Evaluation ensures that the data is reliable and consistent with the initial objectives of the research. Different statistical tools and methodologies, as mentioned above, help evaluate result of study. Researchers also have to analyze the currency and relevance of the collected data. Currency pertains to the timeline of the collected data. It is important to ascertain that the collected data is not redundant. Moreover, the relevance of the data is essential in aligning the data with the research objectives. The accuracy of the data is measurable through comparison of the data and by establishing patterns in the data.